Monday, January 28, 2013

Federal employees now guaranteed dental coverage


Federal employees now guaranteed dental coverage
By DrBicuspid Staff
August 29, 2008 -- The U.S. Office of Personnel Management has issued a final rule that ensures federal employees cannot be denied dental coverage because of a pre-existing condition, among other things.
The new regulations -- the result of 2004 legislation establishing dental and vision benefits programs for federal employees, annuitants, and their eligible family members -- explain how employees enroll, the types of coverage being offered, and other features of the new insurance.
As established by the 2004 law, the government does not subsidize dental coverage for federal employees, but employees may pay premiums with pretax dollars.
Dental coverage is offered by Aetna Life Insurance Company, Government Employees Health Association, MetLife, United Concordia Companies, Group Health, CompBenefits, and Triple-S.

Delta Dental honors 65 students for leadership


Delta Dental honors 65 students for leadership
By DrBicuspid Staff
August 29, 2008 -- Sixty-five outstanding dental school students received nearly a quarter of a million dollars in grants this year from Delta Dental of California, Delta Dental of Pennsylvania, and affiliated companies, the company announced in a press release.
The 2008 Student Leadership Awards recognize graduating dental students who demonstrate outstanding leadership abilities. Students from 20 different dental schools in 12 states plus the District of Columbia received a total of $212,500, with individual amounts ranging from $2,500 to $12,500.
Delta Dental established the awards in 1977 in honor of Dr. F. Gene Dixon, the first chief executive officer of Delta Dental of California.

Woman disabled from jaw surgeries awarded $14 million


Woman disabled from jaw surgeries awarded $14 million
By Rabia Mughal, Contributing Editor
August 29, 2008 -- A Washington woman has been awarded more than $14 million in damages after a series of dental surgeries left her jaw fused shut.
A Spokane County Superior Court jury ruled that the treatment Kimberly Kallestad received from Patrick C. Collins, D.D.S., an oral surgeon practicing in Spokane, was below the standard of care. Kallestad was awarded $10 million in noneconomic damages for pain, suffering, and disfigurement and the rest for economic damages such as loss of wages and medical expenses.
In addition to the civil suit, the Washington State Dental Quality Assurance Commission is considering opening an investigation into the case, according to Tim Church, communications director for the Washington State Department of Health. Two investigations have already been opened on Dr. Collins, he added -- one a standard of care case, the other involving 71-year-old Jon Gellner, who died after palate surgery performed by Dr. Collins, reported the Spokesman Review.
The state dental board came under fire earlier this year for not being thorough in its review of dentistry-related deaths. A series of articles in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer dating back to 2005 has prompted the state to take a harder look at the board's decision-making processes.
Kallestad, 29, a former cheerleader and tennis player who had dreams of becoming a lawyer, is now unable to work and lives under the care of her parents. She was involved in a sledding accident in early 2000 that caused her to develop TMJ symptoms. She was also diagnosed with a slightly displaced soft-tissue disk in her left jaw joint.
After nine months of pain and conservative treatment, she went to Dr. Collins. He treated her with bilateral steroid and sodium hyaluronate injections in her jaw joints, plus open joint surgeries, according to Kallestad's attorney, Mary Schultz. Dr. Collins also performed an arthroplasty with a modified Walker repair on Kallestad's left partially displaced disk, claiming that he had a success rate of more than 95% with the surgery. He then performed the same operation on her right jaw joint.
The Walker repair procedure was originally developed by 84-year-old surgeon Robert Walker in 1987, according to Schultz.
"It was controversial even then," she said. "Dr. Collins has reworked it and made it more risky."
Dr. Collins published a study in 2007 that evaluated the outcome of the Walker repair technique in TMJ patients, concluding that it is an effective surgical treatment (Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, October 2007, Vol. 65:10, pp.1958-1962).
According to Kallestad's complaint, first filed in 2004, Dr. Collins did not inform her of the controversy within the oral surgery community regarding the use of invasive and irreversible surgery for pain and minor disk displacement in circumstances like hers and the potential risks associated with the treatment. Also, he did not tell her about alternative treatments that would not carry these risks.
In fact, Dr. Collins assured Kallestad that the arthroplasty procedure had a 95% success rate in reducing pain and dysfunction, but in his hands it was 100% successful, Schultz said.
Kallestad's jaw started degenerating after the surgeries. She developed complex regional pain syndrome, which began spreading from the surgery sites to other parts of her body, and, ultimately, her jaw started to fuse shut.
"He [Dr. Collins] told Kimberly, when she returned with pain, that he had 'fixed' her and that there was nothing wrong with her," Schultz said. He told her "it was all in her head."
Kallestad then consulted with other physicians. Her jaw had to be reopened by a gap arthroplasty, but fused two more times due to the ankylosis.
"Now she is fully disabled," Schultz said. "There is constant burning pain in her jaw."
Schultz took the case in 2004, shortly before the three-year statute of limitations expired.
"We did this to try to protect other patients and provide a voice for the victims," Kallestad told the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
Dr. Collins' attorney, John Versnel, plans to appeal.
"Any time a jury spends six weeks listening to a case you have to respect the decision, but the dollar amount just does not make any sense," he said. "The jury listened to a lot of inflammatory evidence, and that will be the basis of our appeal. There was a lot of extraneous information, like testimony from unhappy former patients, while we were not allowed to bring in satisfied patients."
Kallestad received considerable additional medical treatment after she left Dr. Collin's care that contributed to her condition, he added.
Schultz argues that Dr. Collins' lawyers are just trying to deflect the blame.
"They claimed everyone except Dr. Collins was to blame," she said. "They blamed her parents, the subsequent doctors, everyone -- except Dr. Collins."
Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Sunday, January 27, 2013

CBCT: First choice for preoperative diagnosis?


CBCT: First choice for preoperative diagnosis?
By Greg Holden 
July 18, 2008 -- Many dentists would say that nothing is certain except death, taxes, and the need to get a clear view of impacted or diseased teeth before removal or surgery.
Introducing CEREC® Omnicam.The most perfect CAD/CAM camera ever
SironaSlim, elegant design for easier intraoral access, fast photorealistic color imaging, and powderless convenience make the new CEREC Omnicam the most precise, easy-to-use CAD/CAM
camera ever.
When it comes to looking below the gum line and deep into the mandibular canal, anything that helps you get a better view is essential. Two recent studies indicate that cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is superior to conventional periapical x-rays for two types of preoperative visualization: inspecting impacted third molars prior to extraction, and viewing posterior maxillary teeth that have been referred for apical surgery.
Does this mean that more dentists -- including general dentists -- should be using CBCT in these two cases? It depends.
When it comes to preoperative diagnosis of posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery, Dr. Karl Dula's opinion is crystal clear: "Absolutely not!"
Dula, P.D., D.M.D., and a member of the department of oral surgery and stomatology at the University of Bern School of Dental Medicine in Switzerland, is a co-author of recent study that compared periapical radiography with CBCT for visualizing posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. The researchers found that CBCT yielded significantly better results in detecting lesions, including the expansion of lesions into the maxillary sinus or in roots in close proximity to the maxillary sinus floor (Journal of Endodontics, May 2008, Volume 34:5, pp. 557-562).
These findings do not mean that cone beam is always the best choice, however. "CBCT should only be used in cases where pain or other chronic sensation is reported and there is nothing to be seen in the periapical radiograph," Dr. Dula said. "If there is a lesion in the periapical radiograph, it is sufficient for diagnosis for apical surgery."
The lead author of the second study, which compared cone-beam volumetric imaging with radiographs for localizing the mandibular canal before removing impacted lower third molars, said his group's findings indicate that using CBCT is advantageous, but only under certain conditions (Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, May 2008, Volume 105: 5, pp. 633-642).
"If the root tip is on or below the mandibular canal, the answer is yes," said Jörg Neugebauer, D.M.D., of the interdisciplinary outpatient department for oral surgery and implantology, department of craniomaxillofacial and plastic surgery, at the University of Cologne in Germany.
However, Dr. Neugebauer acknowledged that the diagnoses made either by CBCT or a panoramic radiograph and symmetrical PC cephalometric radiograph (PAN&PA) could not be confirmed by histology of the teeth because the scans were made "from real patients under clinical conditions."
Other observers are more enthusiastic about the role CBCT can play in preoperative diagnoses. Jeffrey H. Brooks, D.M.D., an oral surgeon with Central Arkansas Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Center in Little Rock, AR, and a fellow with the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, shares an i-CAT cone-beam scanner by Imaging Sciences with three other professionals primarily for implants. They perform 20 to 40 third-molar extractions per day. His opinion on the cone beam is succinct: "Use it."
"Conventional panoramic scanners let you see whether or not the roots of the impacted third molar overlap the alveolar nerve, and you can see the superior-inferior position of the root in relation to the nerve," Dr. Brooks said. "But the medial-lateral position of the tooth in relation to the nerve is a mystery."
If the tooth is too close to the nerve and the nerve is bumped during extraction, numbness can result. "Prior to cone beam, I would always tell the patient, 'I can see that the nerve overlaps the root on the Panorex. However, I cannot tell how close the nerve is to the medial-lateral position, the horizontal position, or the cross-sectional position of the root.' The cross-sectional image cannot be obtained from a panoramic image."
According to Allan Farman, Ph.D., M.B.A., D.Sc., a professor of radiology and imaging science at the University of Louisville School of Dentistry, who edited Dr. Neugebauer's third-molar study, "Panoramic radiography is probably adequate in cases where the third molar is not superimposed or impinging on the canal. But I believe one needs to get a view of the third dimension every time, in situations where the canal is superimposed on or intimately related to the third molar on panoramic images."
According to Dr. Farman and Dr. Brooks, it's the difference between guessing (with the panoramic radiograph) and observing what is clearly shown (with the CBCT). Cone-beam technology makes it possible to take a cross-sectional view so you can see the medial-lateral as well as superior-inferior position of the tooth in relation to the nerve.
Dr. Brooks noted that, before cone beam became available, he would tell a patient, "We can see a change in the root canal, and we can see that the nerve is close to the root. If the tooth isn't painful, you may not want to risk a numb lip or paresthesia, and you can elect not to remove it."
Too much information?
But is knowing precisely how close the tooth is to the nerve causing some dentists to use bad judgment?
"The anecdotal evidence is that there are possibly dentists who are looking at cone-beam scans that show the third molar being 1 mm away from the nerve, and they think, 'I can take it out because it won't cause numbness.' They are being more aggressive in cases where they might have been more reluctant using a a panoramic radiograph," Dr. Brooks said.
On the other hand, cone beam gives additional control to both patient and practitioner. "From a medical-legal standpoint, it is a significant benefit," Dr. Brooks said. "If you have a symptomatic third molar that the patient cannot avoid taking out because it is going to cause an infection, a cone-beam scan can demonstrate that the third molar root is next to the canal or that the tooth root has formed around the nerve. You can image this with a CBCT, show it to the patient, and demonstrate that paresthesia will very likely result from the extraction. They can then sign the consent form to do the surgery, and if numbness does result, the practitioner is protected from being sued."
These studies provide further evidence that general dentists and other practitioners should be considering cone beam as an additional diagnostic tool. Still, as noted in previous articles, cone-beam technology takes time to pay for itself. Other pros and cons include:
ProsCons
Superior detail and imagingPatient will probably have to pay the dentist directly
Less radiation than a full mouth series of x-rays or a medical-grade fan-beam CT scanExpense of buying and maintaining the machine
Having cone beam available may generate more businessDentist may get overaggressive in treatment
Oral surgeons in particular should consider adding CBCT to their armamentarium, according to Dr. Farman.
"Third molars are not commonly removed by general dentists in the U.S.," he said. "Most cases are considered too complex and sent to an oral surgeon. This is a good reason for oral surgeons to have CBCT or to refer a patient for cone-beam CT. There are a number of systems and they are not all identical. Some reveal a fairly large volume of tissue, while others are more limited and just reproduce tissues that the dentist is familiar with. But the potential for damage to the mandibular canal, the possibility of loss of sensation to one side of the lower lip with likely drooling, and the consequent negative quality-of-life issues, mean that one should do whatever is possibly achievable to prevent those untoward effects from occurring. Now that we have CBCT and can look in three dimensions as opposed to 2D with a panoramic field-of-view, I would choose CBCT whenever there is doubt.."
Dr. Brooks, who is an oral surgeon, agrees. "If you do have a general dentist taking out a third molar, there is no question that there is a significant benefit to having cone beam in your office," he concluded.

Intertrade to distribute ViziLite Plus in Greece and Cyprus


Intertrade to distribute ViziLite Plus in Greece and Cyprus
By DrBicuspid Staff
July 18, 2008 -- Zila has selected Intertrade Dental to be the exclusive distributor of its oral cancer screening product in Greece and Cyprus.
ViziLite Plus with TBlue is an FDA-approved device for the early detection of oral abnormalities that could lead to cancer.
"ViziLite Plus will provide dental professionals in Greece and Cyprus with an effective screening tool in the fight against oral cancer," said David Bethune, chairman and CEO of Zila, in a press release. "We have experience working with Intertrade and we are confident they will be a first-rate marketing partner."
Terms of the agreement were not disclosed.

Friday, January 25, 2013

Why live-patient courses are essential


Why live-patient courses are essential
By Helaine Smith, DMD, MBA
December 30, 2008 -- Editor's note: Helaine Smith's column, The Mouth Physician, appears regularly on theDrBicuspid.com advice and opinion page, Second Opinion.
"A Bridgeport jury has awarded more than $198,000 to a woman who claims her dentist promised her a celebrity smile, but gave her what her attorney called 'horse teeth.' " -- The Associated Press
The media loves stories like this one, which has caught the attention of many people. Although the public is more informed than ever concerning cosmetics, many patients still trust their dentist to deliver quality work.
I do not know any details about this case other than what I read. I do not want to speak out of turn about the named dentist. Instead, I want to use this case as an example to illustrate that you must take proper live-patient courses in order to do cosmetic dentistry successfully.
There are many ingredients to a cosmetic practice, but skill is the most important one. Using a trained ceramist in cosmetics is the second most important.
During the initial cosmetic consult, my trained eye is evaluating the face shape and teeth shape and visualizing what smile design would best enhance the patient. I am also actively listening to what the patient wants, and a "Hollywood smile" is not enough detail for me. What does that mean to the patient? Does it mean what I think it does?
All of this must be understood in order to tell the ceramists what the smile design will be. Study models are examined, and a diagnostic wax-up to proper golden proportion is preformed. If I sense any hesitation from the patient, a simple way to show the patient the final results is accomplished by laying over their existing teeth acrylic from a stent of the wax-up. This will show them what the teeth will be like in their mouth. Before I pick up my headpiece, I know where I am going with the case. It is not guess work.
Cosmetics is more than prepping teeth and bonding veneers. Here again, the expression "You do not know what you do not know" applies. I urge you to learn more and take a comprehensive cosmetic course at one of the leading institutions in the country. To be the best, you need to learn from the best, with a live-patient hands-on course.
The Las Vegas Institute for Advanced Dental Studies and the Rosenthal Institute offer curriculums like this. It is a big commitment of time and money to travel to one of these places, but you owe it to your patients if you claim you are proficient in cosmetics.
Patients are very educated today, thanks to the Internet, and in order to have a competitive advantage, you need be well-trained. I encourage all dentists in the new year to make a commitment to being better at what they do, whether it is general dentistry, a specialty, or cosmetics. Please be the best and strive to be a mouth physician at all times.
The comments and observations expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the opinions of DrBicuspid.com, nor should they be construed as an endorsement or admonishment of any particular idea, vendor, or organization.
Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Electronic health records: Part I -- Boon or boondoggle?


Electronic health records: Part I -- Boon or boondoggle?
By Kathy Kincade, Editor in Chief
December 31, 2008 -- Valerie Powell, Ph.D., is on a mission.
The 70-year-old professor of computer science at Robert Morris University in Pittsburgh says the creation of an electronic health record (EHR) that combines both medical and dental data cannot wait until 2015.
That is when the U.S. National Health Information Infrastructure (NHII) is slated to be up and running, and doctors and dentists are expected to be in compliance with federal mandates regarding the adoption of EHRs.
“Our nation needs excellent chronic care, and to make this happen means ensuring that the dentists and physicians can communicate.”
— Valerie Powell, Ph.D.
A new study shows that dentists aren't moving fast enough to meet these requirements, and that usability of existing software products is the problem. Others argue that patient privacy and implementation costs are the real issues.
Either way, Powell -- who recently hosted a teleconference with dental and medical experts that resulted in a 40-page report on EHRs that is being submitted to Tom Daschle, the nominee for secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services -- is adamant that EHRs must be adopted ASAP. There are too many chronically ill people who need dentists and physicians to start communicating now, she says.
Foremost among these patients are diabetics, a population she became very familiar with in her second career as a radiology technician. In fact, the correlation between periodontitis and diabetes is a prime example of why physicians and dentists should be sharing information sooner rather than later, argues Powell, who serves on a Pennsylvania task force that deals with the problem.
"Our nation needs excellent chronic care, and to make this happen means ensuring that the dentists and physicians can communicate," she said. "People are dying. This is urgent now."
Practitioners balk
The merits of transitioning to a paperless medical and dental office have been touted for years: increased efficiency, better care, fewer mistakes, the ability to track a condition over time or access patient information anytime, anyplace, anywhere -- the list goes on and on.
And once the NHII is in place, its designers and developers envision "regional collaborations among healthcare entities, including dentists and other healthcare practitioners, so that a patient's information can be securely stored in the local community and made electronically accessible to all healthcare providers involved in treatment of a particular patient," according to the ADA Web site.
And yet, adoption among the medical and dental communities remains low. According to a study published last month in the Journal of the American Dental Association, "In both medicine and dentistry, practitioners in solo and small-group practices have been slow to adopt CPRs (computer-based patient records). ... In dentistry, 25 percent of all general practitioners in the United States used a computer in at least one of their operatories in 2005. ... However, as of 2005, only 1.8 percent of general dental offices maintained patient records almost completely on the computer, suggesting a low adoption rate of CPRs" (JADA, December 2008, Vol. 139:12, pp. 1632-1642).
Building from previous research that suggested usability might be the issue, researchers from the University of Pittsburgh Center for Dental Informatics and New York University College of Dentistry evaluated four commercial practice management software products -- Dentrix (Henry Schein), EagleSoft (Patterson Dental), Kodak SoftDent (Carestream Health), and Kodak PracticeWorks (Carestream Health/PracticeWorks) -- to assess the ease of usability of their charting interfaces.
Working with four full-time dental faculty members, eight practicing dentists, and eight senior dental students from the university who all had computer (Windows) experience but no dental CPR familiarity, the researchers concluded that all four systems have "significant usability problems for novice users, resulting in a steep learning curve and potentially reduced system adoption."
The authors noted that "several lessons for the future design and redesign of dental CPR systems emerged from our analysis of design features responsible for usability problems." For example, task flow and models in the CPR systems "should be aligned more closely with common practice," and data entry and retrieval controls "should correspond with the tasks to be completed, while unrelated or extraneous controls should not be shown."
Two of the vendors whose products were part of the study -- Patterson and PracticeWorks, a subsidiary of Carestream Health -- took some exception to the findings (Henry Schein did not respond to our requests for comment). In particular, they noted that the study was done in a laboratory setting without the subjects receiving any training.
"Because our software is so robust and has to be able to accommodate the functionality of many different offices, part of our training is not just teaching users how to use the software but seeing how each office functions and setting up the software so it flows naturally for them," said Jana Berghoff, corporate technology manager at Patterson. "If you just sit down [at the computer] without a trainer, it might not feel so intuitive."
PracticeWorks U.S. CEO Patrik Eriksson agreed. "The research did not have a training component to it, so there is a difference between what was researched and what a normal customer would experience," he said, adding that the company is taking the study's findings "to heart" and that it is time to "redesign the way that software works."
In addition, the company has released two versions of PracticeWorks since the study was conducted, noted Larry Greenspan, vice president of development at PracticeWorks.
"There have been 572 enhancements to our products this year, and these are all customer-requested enhancements," he said.
One vendor that was not part of the study believes the JADA study is not so much about the software but about the users of clinical records.
"I think the most important aspect of this article is that there is a need to standardize clinical data so it can be exchanged between all offices," said Mark Hollis, president of MacPractice, the only Mac-based practice management and EHR system on the market. "Our highest priorities in product design have to do with flexibility and customizability. This allows us to recreate the model and the forms an office is accustomed to. You have to get people to buy into wanting to change, so the more your electronic system reflects what they are familiar with in a paper system, the easier the transition."
Tom Cockerell, D.D.S., agrees.
"In my opinion, the conclusions the researchers draw are not really that important in the clinical setting. From a pure research point of view, where data accumulates beginning with the ground floor, it is good to have this information," said Dr. Cockerell, a practicing dentist in Fort Worth, TX, and founder of an Internet-based patient record system company called Dental Symphony. "But it doesn't provide much value in answering the overriding question: why, after 30 years of computer records being available, do only 2% of dentists use them to manage patient care? Their conclusion is that usability is keeping dentists from adopting electronic records to manage patients, but there are bigger overriding issues."
In part II of this series, we look at how patient privacy, legacy software, and a lack of return on investment are also impeding adoption of electronic health records.

Study: Oral bisphosphonate risks higher than reported


Study: Oral bisphosphonate risks higher than reported
By Rabia Mughal, Contributing Editor
January 2, 2009 -- A University of Southern California (USC) study published in this month's Journal of the American Dental Association has found that the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients who have undergone oral bisphosphonate therapy could be higher than currently believed. Even short-term use can leave some patients vulnerable, according to the researchers.
“These results make a significant difference in the counseling and management of
patients on oral bisphosphonates.”
— Peter L. Jacobsen, Ph.D., D.D.S.
Most journals say the risk of osteonecrosis is negligible with oral bisphosphonates, but there is not enough data to back up this claim, said Parish Sedghizadeh, D.D.S., the director of the USC Center for Biofilms and one of the study authors, in a DrBicuspid.com interview.
"We found that approximately 4% of the patients who had a history of alendronate use developed osteonecrosis of the jaw," he said.
"These results make a significant difference in the counseling and management of patients on oral bisphosphonates," said Peter L. Jacobsen, Ph.D., D.D.S., the vice chairman of the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs. "The risk shown by this article is about two orders of magnitude higher than found in prior studies."
All healthcare providers and susceptible patients need to be made aware of the risks, he added.
But Merck, the maker of the oral bisphosphonate drug Fosamax, said in a written statement to DrBicuspid.com that the study is flawed, limited, and not a reliable source for valid scientific conclusions.
"Data from randomized, prospective clinical trials are the gold standard and are more reliable than data from studies like the one published in JADA," the company stated. "In controlled clinical trials involving more than 17,000 patients, contributing as much as 10 years' data with alendronate, there have been no reports of ONJ. This includes approximately 3,000 osteoporosis patients taking alendronate for 3 to 5 years and approximately 800 patients taking alendronate for 8 to 10 years."
The initial correlation between the use of oral alendronate and ONJ was not considered statistically significant by an expert panel appointed by the ADA Council on Scientific Affairs in 2006. The panel suggested then that routine dental treatment generally should not be modified solely on the basis of oral bisphosphonate therapy, the USC study authors noted.
Their recommendation was reaffirmed in 2008.
"We conducted a study to address the finding that in a patient population at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles, ONJ secondary to alendronate therapy is more common than suggested by the manufacturer and the ADA's expert panel," the authors wrote.
The study, which appears in the January issue of the Journal of the American Dental Association (January 2009, Vol. 140:1, pp. 61-66), was conducted at the USC School of Dentistry. It included 208 patients with a history of alendronate use, nine of whom had active ONJ and were being treated in USC clinics.
None of the patients was referred for evaluation or treatment of ONJ, excluding the possibility of referral bias, the authors noted.
Of the 208 patients, 66 underwent simple dental extraction without treatment modifications or preventive measures, and four developed ONJ at the extraction site postoperatively. Another five developed ONJ after denture-related mucosal ulceration.
The patients who developed bisphosphonate-associated osteonecrosis were all women between the ages of 63 to 80 who had received alendronate for osteoporosis for 12 months or longer.
Osteoporosis affects more than 10 million Americans, and alendronate is the most widely prescribed oral drug; it was the 21st most prescribed drug on the market in 2006, the authors noted. Despite these numbers, there are no epidemiologic data or research to support the risk of developing ONJ after its use, they added.
"Our data suggest that the risk of developing ONJ is much higher than initially reported," the authors noted.
This is not the first study of risk/incidence of ONJ in patients taking oral bisphosphonates, but it is the first to measure patients directly, explained Dr. Jacobsen.
The other studies estimated the risk from physicians voluntary reporting in the U.S. (which has a high risk of underreporting), physicians reporting in Australia (where such reporting is required, rather than voluntary, so the numbers are considered more accurate), or computerized analysis of insurance claims data with no patients or physician involvement, he added.
"If the current study holds up and future studies in other centers document its accuracy, then the prior study methods have appreciably underestimated the risk," Dr. Jacobsen emphasized.
Dental treatment implications
These findings clearly have implications for dentists working with patients who have a history of oral bisphosphonate use.
Alternate treatment options may be considered for unnecessary extractions, and good oral hygiene should be achieved before necessary extractions to minimize microbial load, according to the study authors.
They also recommend more routine and vigilant follow-up and use of chlorhexidine rinse preoperatively and postoperatively.
"Patients should get a dental consult before starting oral bisphosphonate therapy," Dr. Sedghizadeh said. "There should be comanagement of such patients by dentist and physicians, and it is important that they are involved in the informed consent process."
It is also important to identify patients who are at risk and focus on risk assessment and prevention protocols, he added.
"Most of the patients receiving alendronate at USC who developed ONJ did so after routine tooth extraction, suggesting that perhaps these patients should be identified as an at-risk population and preventive measures should be taken," the study authors noted.
There is a need for more studies in this area, Dr. Sedghizadeh said. People will say the risk may not be negligible if more studies like this come out, he added.
More science is needed to better understand why some patients get ONJ and others do not -- as well as what can be done to minimize the likelihood of this serious condition among susceptible patients, Dr. Jacobsen noted. This kind of patient-based data is what the ADA has said is needed all along, he emphasized.
Additional studies will be needed to better delineate the risk across the entire population of alendronate users, he concluded.

Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Brighter teeth without bleaching?


Brighter teeth without bleaching?
By Rabia Mughal, Contributing Editor
November 13, 2008 -- A perfect pearly white smile is a priority for many patients, and that usually means a dose of at-home or in-office bleaching. But what about situations in which bleaching is not an option?
One possible treatment in such cases is "tooth lightening." Developed in 2000 at the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, this technique avoids peroxide altogether, instead relying on remineralization to change tooth color.
“It's a partner to whitening, not an alternative.”
Basically, a dentist or hygienist polishes and smoothes the tooth surface, making it reflect more light and appear brighter. This is followed by at-home remineralization therapy to strengthen enamel.
"There is no oxidation chemistry at work; rather, it is remineralization chemistry, so the enamel and dentin color is not changed dramatically," said Laurence J. Walsh, Ph.D., D.D.Sc., the head of dentistry at the University of Queensland and an inventor of the technique, in an interview with DrBicuspid.com. "It's a partner to whitening, not an alternative."
The concept exploits the optical properties of the tooth, particularly the enamel, and the influence of water present in the enamel.
"The scientific foundations of the tooth-lightening concept rest largely on altering the short wavelength (blue) scatter of enamel and reducing its transmission of yellow light," Dr. Walsh wrote in Australasian Dental Practice (March/April 2008, Vol. 192, pp. 48-50). "The more porous the enamel, the less it scatters short (blue) wavelengths of light. The more the enamel scatters blue light, the lighter it appears."
During the procedure, the patient first receives a gentle microabrasion procedure using 37% phosphoric acid etching for 20 seconds, followed by gentle application of flour of pumice or graded abrasive pastes at low rotational speeds. This process enhances not only the scatter of the shorter wavelengths but also the subsequent subsurface mineral changes, Dr. Walsh explained in the article.
The patient then uses MI Paste each night immediately before bed for at least two weeks. This process results in a reduced yellow transmission and increased backscatter of blue light from the enamel, making teeth appear brighter, he explained furthur in the article.
MI paste contains Recaldent, which is touted by makers to have remineralization qualities -- a claim that has been refuted by many researchers but upheld by others.
Where did the idea for tooth lightening come from?
"When we began working with topical preparations of Recaldent about eight years ago, we realized that several changes in the optical properties of enamel occurred," Dr. Walsh said. "We were interested in applications of this material for altering enamel, and when we started to analyze before/after images of patients we had treated to reverse their enamel demineralization, it became clear that there were other effects as well as reducing the areas of opacity."
The tooth-lightening procedure can be used on patients with minor enamel opacities prior to whitening to achieve a consistent enamel shade, explained Dr. Walsh.
"We also use the lightening method on patients with very light baseline shades, such as A1 or B1, to maximize the reflective light appearance of their teeth -- since there would be limited benefit in attempting whitening in such patients," he said.
According to Dr. Walsh, likely candidates for tooth lightening include:
  • Patients with mild fluorosis
  • Patients who have small enamel opacities from previous whitening treatments that have caused overbleaching
  • Patients who have just been debanded after fixed orthodontic treatment
  • Pediatric patients, who you would not consider for bleaching treatment
The technique was developed in Australia and has been in clinical use there for many years. It is also popular in Southeast Asia and New Zealand, Dr. Walsh explained. However, it has yet to garner much attention in the U.S.
Edward J. Swift Jr., D.M.D., M.S., professor and chair of the department of operative dentistry at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and associate editor of the Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, told DrBicuspid.com that he had not heard of tooth lightening and so could not comment on it.
Lynn Ramer, L.D.H., president-elect of the American Dental Hygienists' Association, said that patients should ask their oral healthcare professional about all whitening options and whether they are an ideal candidate for this procedure.
"Experts agree that peroxide is usually the way to go," she added.

300,000 patient records hacked at Florida dental college


300,000 patient records hacked at Florida dental college
By DrBicuspid Staff
November 12, 2008 -- University of Florida officials have notified about 330,000 current and former dental patients that an unauthorized intruder recently accessed a College of Dentistry computer server storing their personal information, according to a university press release.
The breach was discovered October 3, while college information technology staff members were upgrading the server and found software had been installed on it remotely.
Information stored on the server included names, addresses, birth dates, Social Security numbers, and, in some cases, dental procedure information for patients dating back to 1990.
While there is no evidence the intruder has used any confidential information stored on the server for fraudulent purposes, letters were sent to patients to alert them of the breach. The mailings included a brochure listing preventive steps they can take to obtain copies of their credit reports and avoid identity theft or other illegal uses of their personal data.
"It's unfortunate that, like many large institutions, we were targeted. We work hard to continually fine-tune our security protections, and maintaining our patients' trust and confidence is of utmost importance," said Teresa Dolan, dean of the University of Florida College of Dentistry. "We cannot stress enough how seriously we take this matter. As soon as we learned of this situation, we launched an investigation and implemented additional safeguards designed to protect personal information."
FBI officers are also investigating the data security breach.

Dental implants effective for orthodontic treatment


Dental implants effective for orthodontic treatment
By DrBicuspid Staff
November 12, 2008 -- Orthodontists have been straightening teeth for decades, relying on the ancient physics principle "every action has a reaction," in which tooth displacement in one part of the jaw causes movement on the other as well.
Use of dental implants as orthodontic anchors, however, is changing that principle by expediting treatment times and expanding possibilities for previously untreatable cases, according to research presented at the 2008 American Academy of Implant Dentistry (AAID) meeting taking place in New Orleans this week.
"Dental implants are changing the way orthodontics is being practiced," said Frank Celenza, D.D.S., an associate clinical professor at the New York University College of Dentistry, in an AAID press release. "In conventional orthodontics, teeth are used to move other teeth, but implants can serve as excellent anchors from which force is applied to move the targeted teeth without causing shifts in other teeth."
In his plenary session presentation, Dr. Celenza explained that the use of implants as sources of orthodontic anchorage is a powerful technique that has just begun to be explored. "In our studies, we're already seeing cases in which implants simplify and streamline orthodontic therapy, decrease treatment times, and eliminate dependence on patient compliance in making adjustments and wearing orthodontic appliances," he said.
"Because the anchor systems are so much more predictable and stronger when implants are incorporated, the temporal sequencing of tooth movements is eliminated and teeth can be moved en masse or all together," Dr. Celenza said. "Consequently, treatment times easily can be reduced by a third."
Dr. Celenza added that implants can be used in any orthodontic case that requires tooth replacement, as well as for fully dentate patients. "Cases progress faster when implants are used as anchorage, but not because teeth are subject to higher force levels. Rather, it's is the result of a more efficient appliance design that provides the ability to move multiple teeth simultaneously rather than individually, as is necessary in conventional orthodontics," he said.
Dental implants also make it possible for some patients to receive orthodontic treatment that previously would not be feasible. "Patients with severe orthodontic deformities now can be re-evaluated to determine if orthodontic dental implants could provide successful outcomes," Dr. Celenza said. "In one case of a 63-year-old woman with severe protrusions and very unattractive dentition, I was able to retract her entire maxillary dentition, which improved overall alignment and facial profile and achieved a very impressive and satisfying result with relative ease."

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

Kettenbach enters U.S. dental market


Kettenbach enters U.S. dental market

September 30, 2008 -- Kettenbach, a German producer of impression materials, will now sell its dental products direct to the U.S. dental market. The company's U.S. division is headquartered in Huntington Beach, CA.
To mark its entry into the U.S. dental market, Kettenbach has introduced its full line of Futar bite registration materials, including Futar D, the leading bite registration material in Germany, according to a company press release.
"Kettenbach has developed into a leading player in the global dental market within the impression material sector based on 60 years of experience," said Maribelle Velasco, vice president of sales, marketing, and operations for Kettenbach in the U.S.
The next product slated for direct sales in the U.S. is Silginat, a medium-bodied viscosity, polyvinyl siloxane impression material designed for a variety of indications, such as anatomical models, fabrication of temporary crown and bridges, orthodontic appliances, and case study models. Silginat will be introduced at the 2008 ADA meeting in San Antonio in October.

Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Hoya ConBio offers replacement fibers for DioDent


Hoya ConBio offers replacement fibers for DioDent

September 30, 2008 -- Hoya ConBio announced the availability of a replacement fiber for the original DioDent dental laser models. The new highly flexible fiber is designed to provide optimum performance for a variety of soft-tissue dental procedures, according to the company.
Bendable tips enable easy posterior access, and a nick and fleck cleaving delivers fast fiber preparation and an assured flat fiber tip, the company noted. The fiber kit includes a fiber spool and mount to add to the existing system that conveniently stores the fiber. The new handpiece locks the fiber in place securely, preventing the fiber from pulling out or pushing in. The fingertip jacket stripping eliminates the need for tools.
The fiber is available as a replacement for the DioDent, DioDent II, and LVIlase models, and is already featured on the next-generation DioDent Micro 980 soft-tissue laser.

Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Lack of antibiotics costs dentist $2.6 million


Lack of antibiotics costs dentist $2.6 million

September 29, 2008 -- An Oklahoma dentist's decision not to pretreat a diabetic patient with antibiotics prior to extracting her abscessed tooth may cost him $2.6 million. That is the amount a Comanche County jury has awarded the husband of Linda Culberson, who died in January 2004 from an infection after Robert Morford, D.D.S., of Lawton, OK, pulled her tooth.
Mrs. Culberson, 58, went to Dr. Morford's office in April 2002 with "a chronically abscessed tooth," according to Ed Culberson's attorney, Mike Markey. Dr. Morford opted to pull the tooth but did not give Mrs. Culberson any antibiotics. She then developed a "life-threatening infection," according to Markey. The infection became so serious that she spent 20 months on life support and died in January 2004. Mr. Culberson filed his malpractice lawsuit later that year.
The key issue put before the jury was whether Culberson should have been given antibiotics prior to the extraction, Markey said -- especially because she had poorly controlled diabetes. The ADA recommends that dentists "consider systemic antibiotics for uncontrolled diabetic patients who have frequent infections or heal poorly," and numerous studies have found that infection is a risk for diabetic patients and can make it more difficult to control blood glucose levels. For example, a 2000 study published in the Journal of the American Dental Association concluded that, because insulin-dependent diabetics are particularly susceptible to infections, "antibiotic coverage for invasive dental procedures is recommended in patients with poorly controlled or uncontrolled diabetes" (JADA, March 2000, Vol. 131:3, pp. 366-374).
"The defendant's position was that the antibiotics weren't necessary, and our position was that they were, given her history of health problems," Markey said.
However, the jury found that Mr. Culberson was partly at fault because he did not adequately inform Dr. Morford of Mrs. Culberson's diabetes, Markey said. Culberson's lawsuit originally sought $4 million in damages.
"The jury found that there was some negligence on the part of the husband," Markey said. "One of the issues they raised is that he should have gotten her to the dentist sooner."
Michael Hill, Dr. Morford's attorney, told DrBicuspid.com that Dr. Morford met the standard of care in that removing the source of the infection -- the tooth -- was the appropriate treatment for the infection, and that antibiotics were not required.
"We did then, and do now, feel as though Dr. Morford met the standard of care," Hill said.
The verdict could be appealed, according to Markey. The court is already considering various post-trial motions, Hill said.

Monday, January 21, 2013

Tories say NHS dental bills rising alarmingly


Tories say NHS dental bills rising alarmingly
By Reuters Health
August 14, 2008 -- LONDON (Reuters), Aug 14 - Patients are now paying an average of 35% more for their National Health Service (NHS) dental treatment than they were when Labour came to power in 1997, the Conservative Party said on Thursday.
In 1997/98, patients spent 389 million pounds on NHS treatment, but that had risen to 475 million pounds by 2006/7, the opposition party calculated.
In total, people have spent 4.5 billion pounds on NHS dental charges under Labour, Shadow Health Minister Mike Penning said.
Two million people in England lost access to an NHS dentist during this time, the Tories said, despite a pledge by then Prime Minister Tony Blair in 1999 that everyone would have access within two years.
"Labour's dental legacy is one of shameful failure," Penning said.
"Not only are people now paying 35% more when they see their NHS dentist, but Labour's botched policies mean that millions of hard-working families have completely lost access to affordable dental care."
A Department of Health spokesman disputed the statistics saying they were "misleading and did not compare like with like." He said numbers of NHS patients were up by 500,000.
He also said they did not take into account inflation.
"The number of adults registered with an NHS dentist has actually increased by over half a million if you compare the two years leading up to March 1997 to the two years leading up to March 2006," he said.
"Our reforms and total investment of over 2 billion pounds in NHS dentistry is allowing new NHS dental practices to expand and open with dental companies as well as individual dentists bidding to provide more NHS dental services around the country."
He added: "In 1996/97, patient charges were 29% of total dental expenditure where as in 2006/07 this had fallen to 21%."
Last Updated: 2008-08-14 12:00:16 -0400 (Reuters Health)
Copyright © 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Dental product suppliers defy gravity


Dental product suppliers defy gravity
By Kathy Kincade, Editor in Chief
August 13, 2008 -- Halfway through 2008, the U.S. dental equipment business is surprisingly robust.
In fact, despite concerns over the past several months that higher prices and consumer cutbacks were certain to impact the dental business, two of the biggest suppliers --Henry Schein and Dentsply International -- reported record sales and earnings for the second quarter of 2008 (end-June 30). And they are not alone.
“We recorded another quarter of double-digit growth in equipment sales and service revenues.”
— Stanley Bergman, chair and CEO of Henry Schein
Henry Schein reported record overall sales of $1.6 billion for the quarter, with the Dental Group contributing $660 million, up 10% over the second quarter of 2007. This includes an 11% increase in dental equipment sales, according to the company.
"Our Dental Group continues to gain market share in consumable merchandise and in equipment," stated Stanley Bergman, chair and CEO, in a company press release. "We recorded another quarter of double-digit growth in equipment sales and service revenues, highlighted by gains in high-tech products, including acceleration in sales of the E4D CAD/CAM product."
However, the economy did have a negative impact on certain cosmetic and high-end procedures and products, as well as those that are not covered by insurance, company chief financial officer Steven Paladino told Reuters.
Dentsply also reported record sales and earnings for the quarter. Net sales increased 17% to $595 million, up from $507 million for the same quarter in 2007. Net income for the quarter was $79 million, up from $68 million a year ago. The company credits revenue increases in its implant and endodontic businesses for much of this growth; each of these segments saw a 20% increase in quarterly sales year over year
"Our businesses are growing rapidly in many international markets, allowing us to make expanded investments in research and development, as well as in sales force expansion in markets with high growth potential," stated Bret Wise, chairman and CEO of Dentsply, in a press release.
Given its access to the European market, it's not surprising that Swiss supplierStraumann is also experiencing strong growth these days. Straumann reported revenues of $380 million for the quarter, up more than 20% over the previous year's quarter ($324 million). Net profits also rose, from $87 million in the second quarter of 2007 to $93 million in the second quarter of 2008. According to a press release, Europe accounts for nearly two-thirds of Straumann's revenues, and the company is currently experiencing double-digit growth in all key European countries.
Sirona Dental Systems also reported double-digit growth and expects this trend to continue for the rest of the year. The company recorded revenues of $187 million for the quarter, a 19% increase over the same quarter a year ago, with double-digit increases in all of its business segments (treatment centers, CAD/CAM systems, and imaging systems). Net income for the quarter was $6.7 million, compared to $2 million for the same quarter in 2007.
"Growth outside the U.S. is stronger for some of these companies," Jeffrey Johnson, an analyst with Robert W. Baird who specializes in medical and dental technology companies, told DrBicuspid.com in an e-mail. "This trend is partially driven by the faster economic growth seen outside the U.S. and the greater growth opportunities that developing dental markets provide, plus the fact that the U.S. consumer trends have been more sluggish than non-U.S. consumer trends over the past couple of quarters."
As a result, Johnson has revised his position of three months ago, when he lowered the projected stock prices on three major suppliers: Dentsply, Henry Schein, and Patterson Dental (read more). Then, Dentsply stock was valued at around $40; now Johnson has bumped the price target to $44. Similarly, Henry Schein stock was valued at just below $55; today, Johnson has set the price target at $66. Even Sirona has a healthy $32 per share target, according to Johnson.
Not every dental equipment provider is faring quite so well, however. While Biolase Technology appears to be turning things around -- net revenues for the quarter were up slightly from the same quarter a year ago, $18.7 million versus $18.2 million, and net income is back in the black at $648,000 for the quarter (compared to a loss of $2.6 million in the second quarter of 2007) -- the company said Waterlase sales declined 7% due to "weaker international performance," according to a press release.
And although Align Technology, producers of Invisalign, reported record revenues of $80 million for the quarter (up from $77 million in the same quarter a year ago), net profit was just $4 million, compared to a net profit of $13.6 million in the second quarter of 2007.
"As consumer spending has continued to soften, so has our outlook for revenue growth," stated Thomas Prescott, president and CEO, in a press release. As a result, the company is initiating cost-saving measures, he added -- including a workforce reduction of approximately 40 people.

OralDNA Labs to market genetic perio disease test


OralDNA Labs to market genetic perio disease test
By DrBicuspid Staff
August 13, 2008 -- OralDNA Labs has received a nonexclusive license from Interleukin Genetics to market, sell, and distribute Interleukin's PST Genetic Test to U.S. dental practices. The test assesses an individual's genetic risk for periodontal disease.
Interleukin will receive a set fee per test for all tests sold. Also, patients will be asked in the informed consent if they would like to receive additional testing services provided by Interleukin.
"We believe that by combining our MyPerioPath test, which identifies specific pathogenic bacteria causing an infection within the gum structure, with the PST Genetic Test, we are providing the dental community with the proper tools to identify and treat periodontal disease," said Brian Carr, CEO of OralDNA, in a press release. "The combination of both tests creates a systematic way to track and maximize clinical outcomes for dental professionals and their patients."

Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com

Sunday, January 20, 2013

Congressional hearing on amalgam wastewater gets personal


Congressional hearing on amalgam wastewater gets personal
By Kathy Kincade, Editor in Chief
July 9, 2008 -- Representatives from the American Dental Association got a less-than-friendly reception from members of Congress on Tuesday during a hearing on environmental concerns related to amalgam wastewater.
In what news reports described as emotional and at times heated testimony before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform's Subcommittee on Domestic Policy, ADA consultant William J. Walsh came under fire early on when two of the subcommittee members aired "deeply personal diatribes" about their experiences with mercury-based amalgam fillings.
According to a story by the Associated Press, Rep. Dan Burton (R-IN) -- who has held several hearings on mercury in the past -- expressed concerns over some dental work he'd recently had and what impact the removal of a filling might have on the environment. He also talked about one of his grandchildren, who became autistic shortly after receiving several vaccinations, many containing mercury.
Rep. Diane Watson (D-CA) discussed her issues with mercury fillings she received as a child, saying they are responsible for allergies, headaches, and splotchy skin she has suffered from ever since.
Walsh was reportedly "taken aback" by their comments and their emphasis on mercury poisoning, according to the AP. He tried to focus the hearing on the recommendations the ADA had made on proper handling of waste amalgam.
"The ADA has issued and continually updates as appropriate its best management practices [BMPs] for handling waste amalgam," said Walsh, a lawyer who has represented the ADA on amalgam wastewater issues since 2001, to the committee. "These BMPs call for the use of standard control methods, recycling of collected amalgam, and, since last fall, the use of amalgam separators. Dentistry's goals comport exactly with those of government -- to minimize dentistry's discharge of amalgam waste."
Walsh told the subcommittee that dentistry contributes a very small amount of the mercury in wastewater, and that the ADA and its members are taking "every reasonable step" to further minimize that impact, according to a statement by the ADA. However, he also reiterated the ADA's opposition to requiring all dentists to install amalgam separators in their offices.
"Even without separators, dentists capture in their offices approximately 80% of the waste amalgam, with almost all of the remaining 20% captured by water treatment plants before the wastewater is discharged to surface water," he stated. "In other words, 99% of the amalgam is already captured prior to discharge from the POTW [publicly owned treatment works]."
According to a 1997 report to Congress by the Environmental Protection Agency, dentistry contributes less than 1% of the total mercury found in U.S. lakes and streams, Walsh added. Even so, the ADA says it has devoted substantial time and resources to working with government agencies and educating the dental community about amalgam wastewater management.
"Despite the very small share of mercury in surface waters from dental amalgam, America's dentists want to do the right thing and minimize even further impact on the environment," Walsh said. "[They] drink and fish and swim in the same waters as everyone else in their communities and believe that ongoing efforts to encourage the use of BMPs and separators are succeeding and will continue increasingly to succeed."

Lie to the dentist? Not me. Never.


Lie to the dentist? Not me. Never.
By Rochelle Sharpe, DrBicuspid.com contributing writer
July 9, 2008 -- When dentists and their staff ask their patients simple questions, they shouldn't expect truthful answers. That's the take-home message of a recent survey, in which more than four in 10 adults admitted they would tell their dentists they always brushed for the recommended time -- even if it weren't true.
One in four, meanwhile, said they would fib about flossing, too, according to a Harris Interactive poll of 1,001 U.S. adults. The survey was commissioned by Philips Sonicare and the nonprofit group Oral Health America. (Harris declined to provide a margin of error.)
While those numbers might seem high to the straight shooters of the world, experts on lying suspect that the percentage of dental patients who embellish the truth is a lot higher than that. And it illustrates why asking direct questions may not prove the best means of helping patients improve their oral health.
"People lie all the time," said Michael Lewis, Ph.D., a psychiatry professor at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Jersey, who contends that lying is just as common as truth telling. "I would lie if the dentist asked me about flossing."
Why patients lie
“You've got to be really stupid not to lie.”
— Michael Lewis, Ph.D.
Patients tell white lies for many reasons, ranging from wanting to please authority figures to avoiding shame and punishment. No one wants to admit their slothful ways, let alone get a lecture on hygiene. And who wants to aggravate a dentist wielding a syringe?
In such vulnerable situations, lying is "almost a reflex," said Marian Stuart, Ph.D., also a professor at the Robert Wood Johnson Medical School.
"You've got to be really stupid not to lie," said Lewis, citing a study that found children who don't lie have lower IQs. "People lie because they don't want to be scolded."
People lie especially frequently to dental receptionists, said Gary Kadi, who heads NextLevel Practice, a dental management consulting firm in Scottsdale, AZ. In one of his surveys, only 15% of patients told receptionists why they were really canceling appointments, said Kadi, whose clients can have cancellation rates as high as 50%.
When patients finally make it to the dentists' chair and are asked about their oral health habits, they often aren't thinking about brushing or flossing at all, said Dorothea Lack, Ph.D., a former hygienist who's now a psychologist in San Francisco. "They want the doctor to like them," she said. Some patients believe that if dentists and hygienists approve of their patients, the patients will get better care.
On one hand, patients visiting new dentists or hygienists may be embarrassed to admit that they don't brush properly, said Timothy Smith, Ph.D., a behavioral science professor at the University of Kentucky College of Dentistry. "They aren't going to tell a stranger intimate things, even if it's just about dentistry," he said.
On the other hand, those who consider their dentists or hygienists old friends, meanwhile, may tell white lies to spare their feelings. "They don't want to let them down," Smith said.
Then there are the people who lie to themselves. Some may really believe that they have acceptable hygiene habits, while others can't bear to admit to themselves that they are neglecting their oral health.
More concerning than patients who fib about hygiene are those who don't mention that they suffer from debilitating diseases -- a crucial omission that could lead to serious medical complications. For example, a patient who lies about having had endocarditis might not receive the antibiotics recommended before dentistry.
Of course, dentists also want to know if patients carry contagious diseases, such as hepatitis or AIDS. When patients don't reveal the information, they are not necessarily being malicious, Smith said. "People like to forget they have these problems."
Finding the truth
So how can dentists get patients to be more truthful?  The first step: forget the yes and no questions. After all, dentists don't really need patients to plead guilty to poor hygiene. Teeth don't lie.
In the Japanese culture, people rarely ask questions, yet they achieve a lot, according to Lewis. Avoiding questions "turns out to be a useful strategy," he said.
While it would be nice for patients to talk openly about their hygiene habits, remember that finding out the truth is not the ultimate goal. It's far more important for dentists to build strong relationships with their patients -- and convince them to become more compliant, Kadi said.
"You can accomplish anything in the context of a good relationship," Lack agreed.
One way to build good relationships: active listening. Dentists should get in the habit of repeating patients' answers to questions, so they can be sure that they are hearing them correctly, Smith said.
Using nonverbal behavior is important, too. Dentists can encourage patients to open up by leaning forward, maintaining eye contact, and nodding often, Smith said.
Ask open-ended questions and listen for offhand remarks -- comments that don't sound quite right, or what Smith calls "zingers." For instance, a dentist talking to a patient about health problems may conclude a conversation with "Anything else?" If the patient responds with "Nothing important," that's when it's important to follow-up, Smith said. Ask "Nothing important?" and the answer may be "Well, I have these problems in my heart."
Dentists should not be satisfied with a patient's first answer, psychologists say. It's often helpful to ask the same question in different ways and move from general, open-ended questions to extremely specific ones. Dentists can ask patients directly if they are on specific medications, and explain why they need to know.
Creating a nonthreatening environment is key, psychologists say, with some suggesting that dentists go so far as to normalize undesirable behavior. Stuart advises that dentists say something such as "Most people don't floss every day. They don't brush every day. Tell me what you do." Ask patients what makes it hard to have better hygiene habits, and look with them at what the barriers are, she said.
Loving the liar
Look for teachable moments, psychologists say. If patients have bleeding gums, they may be more interested in learning how to properly floss.
To convince patients to take better care of their teeth, praise something, Lack suggested. "They're probably doing something right," she said. "Whatever you praise, you get more of that."
Patients are "expecting to be beat up," said Kadi, the management consultant. Surprise them and tell them something good, he said, even if it's just "you've got good bone structure."
Too many dentists focus on the means such as tooth brushing, rather than the patients' ends: the desire to have a sexy smile or live long enough to watch their children grow up.
"Look beyond the soft and hard tissues, and get to the emotional issues of the patient," he said. With this philosophy, he said, his clients have not only been able to convince their patients to be more compliant, but the dentists have also reaped big financial rewards. He said his more than 600 clients saw their collections grow an average of 37% from May 2007 to May 2008, despite the poor economy. And appointment cancellations are down. "People buy for emotional reasons," he said.
Finally, don't take patients' behavior personally, Lack said. Don't be annoyed if patients lie or even if they don't comply with your instructions. "Patients don't feel well. They may be afraid," she said. "Healthcare workers forget: It isn't about the doctor."
Honestly.

Copyright © 2008 DrBicuspid.com