Friday, January 18, 2013

Trigeminal neuralgia awareness conference on Jan. 26


Trigeminal neuralgia awareness conference on Jan. 26
By DrBicuspid Staff
January 15, 2008 -- A patient complains about a pain like a jolt of lightning that courses through her face whenever she brushes her teeth. Before you reach for your forceps and elevators, consider this. It may not be a dental problem at all.This pain could be a symptom of trigeminal neuralgia, which is a nervous disorder commonly caused by an enlarged artery or a vein pressing on the trigeminal nerve at the base of the brain.
Trigeminal neuralgia often exhibits dental symptoms such as severe toothache, soreness in the jaw, sore gums, and so on. "Some patients see their dentists and actually have a root canal performed, which inevitably brings no relief. When the pain persists, patients realize the problem is not dental-related," according to NeuroSurgerytoday.org.
One way to learn more about recognizing the dental symptoms of this condition is by attending UCSD School of Medicine's and the Trigeminal Neuralgia Association's regional conference on trigeminal neuralgia and chronic facial pain on Jan. 26, 2008.
"Trigeminal neuralgia is incredibly frustrating for patients. Everyday environments and activities produce debilitating pain. Patients report that they cannot sit in an air conditioned room or drink cold water. The lightest touch can trigger an attack whether it is a kiss from a spouse or a light breeze," said John Alksne, M.D., neurosurgeon and researcher at UCSD Medical Center in a press release. "I invite anyone with this disease, including family members, doctors and dentists, to come to UCSD on January 26 to learn more."
The conference will be held at the Skaggs School of Pharmacy UCSD. Medical and dental CE credits will be offered and participants can register for them here.

Amalgams pose no risk to human health, EU report says


Amalgams pose no risk to human health, EU report says
By Reuters Health
January 15, 2008 -- LONDON (Reuters) Jan. 15 Dental amalgam, containing mercury, poses no health risk to the human nervous system, an EU scientific committee said on Tuesday.
The opinion supports arguments by some dentists and governments, who have said the material is safer and more durable than alternatives. But the results caused a stir among patients' organizations who argue amalgam is dangerous, because of the known side effects of mercury.
"The facts do not add up -- mercury is the third most toxic poison in the world and we are still putting it in people's mouths," said Becky Dutton of patient organisation Mercury Madness.
The EU said it had investigated claims of a link between amalgams and a variety of systemic conditions, particularly neurological and psychological or psychiatric effects.
"It is concluded however, that no risks of adverse systemic effects exist and the current use of dental amalgam does not pose a risk of systemic disease," it said.
Most countries advise against use of amalgam for children and pregnant women due to mercury's impact on brain development, but patient organizations believe the rest of the population, carrying an average of 2.5 grams of amalgam in their mouths, is also at risk.
The EU report said no studies had shown that dental personnel suffer classical signs of mercury intoxication.
"All I can say is that if mercury/amalgams are so safe, why have three countries just banned them?" anti-mercury campaigner Dutton asked.
This month the Swedish government is expected to decide on a ban, while Denmark and Norway are taking similar steps.
Another patient organization in Spain said it rejected the provisional report because it was partial and ignored the World Health Organization (WHO) and other scientists' recommendations.
"The main dentist organization (the American Association of Dental Surgeons) before the ADA, already in the 1830s saw a clear relation cause-effect with amalgam...and prohibited its members to place amalgams in people's mouths," the Spanish National Association MERCURIADOS told Reuters in an email.
The opinion provides the EU with scientific advice needed when preparing policy in relation to its wider mercury strategy, which has for example banned the use of mercury in barometers.
The report was prepared by the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) and is made up of external experts.
A public consultation will run to February 22, after which the EU could potentially revise the preliminary report.
Then it is up to the scientific committee to adopt the final opinion and the timeline depends on the number and sort of comments received, the European Commission told Reuters.
Copyright © 2008 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Reuters and the Reuters sphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group of companies around the world.

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Dentist apologizes for stealing body parts


Dentist apologizes for stealing body parts

June 13, 2008 -- A former New Jersey dentist who pleaded guilty in March to stealing body parts from more than 1,000 corpses faced the victims' relatives in court, reported ABC News.

Michael Mastromarino, 44, was the leader of a $4.6 million operation that operated in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania, stealing body parts from funeral homes and selling them to doctors for transplants.

As part of the scheme, a team of "cutters" removed bones, skin, and tendons in an unsanitary embalming room, according to prosecutors. Some patients underwent periodontal surgery using tissue and bone implants from the cadavers.

One of the corpses was that of famous British journalist Alistair Cooke.

Mastromarino at one time had a "thriving" dental practice off Fifth Avenue in New York City, according to a Washington Post article from 2006, when the story first broke. But drug abuse and malpractice lawsuits forced him to surrender his license in 2000. He then founded Biomedical Tissue Services, a tissue recovery business.

"I am truly sorry for the pain that I have caused," Mastromarino told the victims, according to ABC News. "May God have mercy on my soul."

He faces 18 to 54 years in prison.

Tooth soap: A viable alternative to toothpaste?


Tooth soap: A viable alternative to toothpaste?

June 13, 2008 -- "Wash your mouth out with soap" is no longer just a threat parents use to scare foul-mouthed children, but an actual recommendation some dentists are making to their patients.

Vitality Products' Perfect Prescription Tooth Soap, an all-natural oral-care soap made from whole-food ingredients such as palm oil, coconut oil, and extra virgin olive oil, is available online and in certain health stores. It contains no chemicals such as fluoride, glycerin, dyes, artificial flavors, or sweeteners .

The founder and natural health buff, Karen Adler, started the healthnbeauty.com Web site in 1998 and was looking for natural oral-care protocols when she came across research by Gerard F. Judd, Ph.D., a professor, chemist, and researcher. Judd's book, Good Teeth Birth to Death, recommends brushing teeth with pure soap.

Inspired by his work, Adler developed Tooth Soap, which hit the market in October 2003. She has been advocating its advantages over toothpaste ever since.

"Certain ingredients in toothpaste can damage teeth. For example, silica can be abrasive and glycerine can coat the teeth and prevent remineralization," Adler explained. "Soap cleans the mouth and allows saliva to remineralize the teeth naturally."

Adler also has concerns about another common toothpaste ingredient -- sodium lauryl sulphate.

"It is a cheap foaming agent and that is why it is so widely used by personal-care product manufacturers," Adler said. "It is also a known irritant that has been shown in studies to cause canker sores. It does not belong in any oral-care product."

Tooth Soap comes in both liquid and solid form. The solid form is shredded into individual servings that people can bite into, then brush off. One bottle of soap costs $24.95.

Kerry Maguire, D.D.S., M.S.P.H, director of professional advocacy at Tom's of Maine, a manufacturer of natural toothpaste, does not agree that the inclusion of ingredients such as silica, glycerine, or sodium lauryl sulphate in toothpaste is bad for consumers. It is the way these ingredients are sourced that is important, she explains.

"Our ingredients come from plant and mineral sources," Dr. Maguire said. "The sodium lauryl sulphate, for example, comes from a coconut oil."

From a formulation and sustainability standpoint, these ingredients are necessary, she added.

There are no clinical trials to prove that Tooth Soap actually works. It is labelled as a cosmetic product by the FDA and has not been tested by the ADA.

"Perfect Prescription Tooth Soap ... is safe, effective and good for you and your family," Adler's Web site claims.

"Where is the data to back up this claim?" questioned Clifford Whall, Ph.D., director of the ADA Acceptance Program and member of the Council on Scientific Affairs.

The lack of fluoride and silica in Tooth Soap concerns Whall, who questions whether teeth can then be protected effectively against caries or kept free of stains. Silica is a mild abrasive that serves an important purpose, he added.

"It is necessary to clean stains off teeth, otherwise teeth will become dull and dingy," Whall said. "All toothpastes with the ADA seal of approval meet a certain level of abrasivity."

Because Tooth Soap contains zero abrasives, it comes with a bottle of Tooth Brightener to be used once a week.

The lack of research behind Tooth Soap also concerns Jean Conner, president of the American Dental Hygienists Association.

However, "when you get a natural product, it is more of a personal choice than an evidence-based one," she acknowledged. "There are many different oral-care products on the market, and patients need to check with their healthcare professional about which one is right for them."

Also, this product is quite pricey, Conner points out.

"As a healthcare product it does not fit in the family budget," she said.

These concerns have not stopped some dentists from recommending the product to their patients.

Jerome Cohen, D.D.S., who practices in Richmond, VA, says he recommends Tooth Soap because he is not happy with ingredients like glycerin, fluoride, and sodium lauryl sulphate in commercial tooth paste.

"They [the makers of Tooth Soap] say glycerine keeps teeth from remineralizing, and I think that makes sense," Dr. Cohen said. "Like everything you put in your mouth, the less processed it is the better."

As for the product being expensive, Dr. Cohen feels a little bit of soap goes a long way and overall works out to be quite economical.

"This product does not have any negative ingredients, nothing toxic, and is completely innocuous," agreed Barry White, D.D.S., who practices in Kingston, NY.

He tries to keep his patients away from toothpaste with sodium lauryl sulphate and glycerine.

"We have [Tooth Soap] available for patients as it is hard to find a product that is 'pure,'" he said.

Thanks to a growing demand for natural products, business is booming for Adler. The company saw sales of more than $400,000 last year, up from $150,000 in 2004.

But the lack of research behind Tooth Soap might make it harder for the product to succeed in the mainstream market.

"It is not enough to claim that natural is good," Whall said. "There are plenty of things in nature that can kill you."


Patterson Dental offers free practice management software


Patterson Dental offers free practice management software

June 12, 2008 -- Patterson Dental Supply of St. Paul, MN, will now provide its EagleSoft practice management software to dental professionals free of charge.

The software also comes with a data import process, CD-ROM, and Web-based training materials.

"Providing Patterson EagleSoft practice management software at no cost eliminates a major hurdle for dentists seeking better software or looking ahead toward future digital technology purchases," said Scott Anderson, president.

Although the software and accompanying services are free, dental professionals must commit to a one-year service agreement with the company at a monthly fee.

Patterson Dental also provides its EagleSoft digital imaging software at no cost, but only with qualifying digital technology purchases.